Palucka, K. & Banchereau, J. Dendritic cells: a link between innate and adaptive immunity. J. Clin. Immunol. 19, 12–25 (1999).
Rock, K. L., Lai, J. J. & Kono, H. Innate and adaptive immune responses to cell death. Immunol. Rev. 243, 191–205 (2011).
Marshall, J. S., Warrington, R., Watson, W. & Kim, H. L. An introduction to immunology and immunopathology. Allergy Asthma Clin. Immunol. 14, 1–10 (2018).
Feske, S., Wulff, H. & Skolnik, E. Y. Ion channels in innate and adaptive immunity. Ann. Rev. Immunol. 33, 291–353 (2015).
Harjunpää, H., Llort Asens, M., Guenther, C. & Fagerholm, S. C. Cell adhesion molecules and their roles and regulation in the immune and tumor microenvironment. Front. Immunol. 10, 1078 (2019).
Lämmermann, T. & Kastenmüller, W. Concepts of GPCR-controlled navigation in the immune system. Immunol. Rev. 289, 205–231 (2019).
Ravetch, J. V. & Lanier, L. L. Immune inhibitory receptors. Science 290, 84–89 (2000).
Coste, B. et al. Piezo1 and Piezo2 are essential components of distinct mechanically activated cation channels. Science 330, 55–60 (2010).
Coste, B. et al. Piezo proteins are pore-forming subunits of mechanically activated channels. Nature 483, 176–181 (2012).
Hardman, K., Goldman, A. & Pliotas, C. Membrane force reception: mechanosensation in G protein-coupled receptors and tools to address it. Curr. Opin. Physiol. 35, 100689 (2023).
Lin, H.-H., Ng, K.-F., Chen, T.-C. & Tseng, W.-Y. Ligands and beyond: mechanosensitive adhesion GPCRs. Pharmaceuticals 15, 219 (2022).
Wilde, C., Mitgau, J., Suchý, T., Schöneberg, T. & Liebscher, I. Translating the force—mechano-sensing GPCRs. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 322, C1047–C1060 (2022).
Berrier, A. L. & Yamada, K. M. Cell–matrix adhesion. J. Cell. Physiol. 213, 565–573 (2007).
Dustin, M. L. & Chan, A. C. Signaling takes shape in the immune system. Cell 103, 283–294 (2000).
Taylor, P. R. et al. Macrophage receptors and immune recognition. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 23, 901–944 (2005).
Raulet, D. H. Roles of the NKG2D immunoreceptor and its ligands. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 3, 781–790 (2003).
Huse, M. Mechanical forces in the immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 17, 679–690 (2017).
Wang, M. S. et al. Mechanically active integrins target lytic secretion at the immune synapse to facilitate cellular cytotoxicity. Nat. Commun. 13, 3222 (2022).
Sutherland, T. E., Dyer, D. P. & Allen, J. E. The extracellular matrix and the immune system: a mutually dependent relationship. Science 379, eabp8964 (2023).
Yang, C. et al. Mechanical communication and function regulation of immune cells. Fund. Res. pp. 2667–3258 (2024).
Hu, Y. et al. Molecular force imaging reveals that integrin-dependent mechanical checkpoint regulates Fcγ-receptor-mediated phagocytosis in macrophages. Nano Lett. 23, 5562–5572 (2023).
Tabdanov, E. D. et al. Engineering T cells to enhance 3D migration through structurally and mechanically complex tumor microenvironments. Nat. Commun. 12, 2815 (2021).
Pannetier, C., Even, J. & Kourilsky, P. T-cell repertoire diversity and clonal expansions in normal and clinical samples. Immunol. Today 16, 176–181 (1995).
Goldrath, A. W. & Bevan, M. J. Selecting and maintaining a diverse T-cell repertoire. Nature 402, 6–13 (1999).
Linnemann, C. et al. High-throughput identification of antigen-specific TCRs by TCR gene capture. Nat. Med. 19, 1534–1541 (2013).
Smith-Garvin, J. E., Koretzky, G. A. & Jordan, M. S. T cell activation. Ann. Rev. Immunol. 27, 591–619 (2009).
Billadeau, D. D. & Leibson, P. J. ITAMs versus ITIMs: striking a balance during cell regulation. J. Clin. Invest. 109, 161–168 (2002).
Chakraborty, A. K. & Weiss, A. Insights into the initiation of TCR signaling. Nat. Immunol. 15, 798–807 (2014).
Casas, J. et al. Ligand-engaged TCR is triggered by Lck not associated with CD8 coreceptor. Nat. Commun. 5, 5624 (2014).
Wei, Q. et al. Lck bound to coreceptor is less active than free Lck. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 15809–15817 (2020).
Veillette, A., Bookman, M. A., Horak, E. M. & Bolen, J. B. The CD4 and CD8 T cell surface antigens are associated with the internal membrane tyrosine-protein kinase p56lck. Cell 55, 301–308 (1988).
Van Oers, N., Killeen, N. & Weiss, A. Lck regulates the tyrosine phosphorylation of the T cell receptor subunits and ZAP-70 in murine thymocytes. J. Exp. Med. 183, 1053–1062 (1996).
Chan, A. C., Iwashima, M., Turck, C. W. & Weiss, A. ZAP-70: a 70 kd protein-tyrosine kinase that associates with the TCR ζ chain. Cell 71, 649–662 (1992).
Lo, W.-L. et al. Lck promotes Zap70-dependent LAT phosphorylation by bridging Zap70 to LAT. Nat. Immunol. 19, 733–741 (2018).
Zhang, W., Sloan-Lancaster, J., Kitchen, J., Trible, R. P. & Samelson, L. E. LAT: the ZAP-70 tyrosine kinase substrate that links T cell receptor to cellular activation. Cell 92, 83–92 (1998).
Acuto, O. & Michel, F. CD28-mediated co-stimulation: a quantitative support for TCR signalling. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 3, 939–951 (2003).
Esensten, J. H., Helou, Y. A., Chopra, G., Weiss, A. & Bluestone, J. A. CD28 costimulation: from mechanism to therapy. Immunity 44, 973–988 (2016).
Lorenz, U. SHP-1 and SHP-2 in T cells: two phosphatases functioning at many levels. Immunol. Rev. 228, 342–359 (2009).
Allison, J. P. & Lanier, L. L. Structure, func-tion, and serology of the T cell antigen receptor com-plex. Ann. Rev. Immunol. 5, 503–540 (1987).
Alam, S. M. et al. T-cell-receptor affinity and thymocyte positive selection. Nature 381, 616–620 (1996).
Kersh, G. J., Kersh, E. N., Fremont, D. H. & Allen, P. M. High-and low-potency ligands with similar affinities for the TCR: the importance of kinetics in TCR signaling. Immunity 9, 817–826 (1998).
Zhao, X. et al. Tuning T cell receptor sensitivity through catch bond engineering. Science 376, eabl5282 (2022).
Garcia, K. C. et al. An αβ T cell receptor structure at 2.5 Å and its orientation in the TCR-MHC complex. Science 274, 209–219 (1996).
Garcia, K. C. et al. Structural basis of plasticity in T cell receptor recognition of a self peptide-MHC antigen. Science 279, 1166–1172 (1998).
Colf, L. A. et al. How a single T cell receptor recognizes both self and foreign MHC. Cell 129, 135–146 (2007).
Felix, N. J. & Allen, P. M. Specificity of T-cell alloreactivity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 7, 942–953 (2007).
Hogquist, K. A. et al. T cell receptor antagonist peptides induce positive selection. Cell 76, 17–27 (1994).
Von Boehmer, H. & Kisielow, P. Self-nonself discrimination by T cells. Science 248, 1369–1373 (1990).
Alam, S. M. et al. Qualitative and quantitative differences in T cell receptor binding of agonist and antagonist ligands. Immunity 10, 227–237 (1999).
Pettmann, J. et al. The discriminatory power of the T cell receptor. eLife 10, e67092 (2021).
González, P. A. et al. T cell receptor binding kinetics required for T cell activation depend on the density of cognate ligand on the antigen-presenting cell. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 4824–4829 (2005).
Carreño, L. J., González, P. A. & Kalergis, A. M. Modulation of T cell function by TCR/pMHC binding kinetics. Immunobiology 211, 47–64 (2006).
Govern, C. C., Paczosa, M. K., Chakraborty, A. K. & Huseby, E. S. Fast on-rates allow short dwell time ligands to activate T cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 8724–8729 (2010).
Schodin, B. A., Tsomides, T. J. & Kranz, D. M. Correlation between the number of T cell receptors required for T cell activation and TCR–ligand affinity. Immunity 5, 137–146 (1996).
Snook, J. P., Kim, C. & Williams, M. A. TCR signal strength controls the differentiation of CD4+ effector and memory T cells. Sci. Immunol. 3, eaas9103 (2018).
Hwang, J.-R., Byeon, Y., Kim, D. & Park, S.-G. Recent insights of T cell receptor-mediated signaling pathways for T cell activation and development. Exp. Mol. Med. 52, 750–761 (2020).
Chen, D. G., Xie, J., Su, Y. & Heath, J. R. T cell receptor sequences are the dominant factor contributing to the phenotype of CD8+ T cells with specificities against immunogenic viral antigens. Cell Rep. 42, 113279 (2023).
Murugan, A., Huse, D. A. & Leibler, S. Speed, dissipation, and error in kinetic proofreading. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 12034–12039 (2012).
Tonegawa, S. Somatic generation of antibody diversity. Nature 302, 575–581 (1983).
Schroeder, H. W. Jr. & Cavacini, L. Structure and function of immunoglobulins. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 125, S41–S52 (2010).
Nimmerjahn, F. & Ravetch, J. V. Fcγ receptors as regulators of immune responses. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 8, 34–47 (2008).
Batista, F. D., Iber, D. & Neuberger, M. S. B cells acquire antigen from target cells after synapse formation. Nature 411, 489–494 (2001).
Tolar, P. Cytoskeletal control of B cell responses to antigens. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 17, 621–634 (2017).
van Spriel, A. B. et al. Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18) is essential for Fc receptor–mediated neutrophil cytotoxicity and immunologic synapse formation. Blood 97, 2478–2486 (2001).
Goodridge, H. S., Underhill, D. M. & Touret, N. Mechanisms of Fc receptor and dectin-1 activation for phagocytosis. Traffic 13, 1062–1071 (2012).
Bakalar, M. H. et al. Size-dependent segregation controls macrophage phagocytosis of antibody-opsonized targets. Cell 174, 131–142(2018).
Staunton, D. E., Dustin, M. L., Erickson, H. P. & Springer, T. A. The arrangement of the immunoglobulin-like domains of ICAM-1 and the binding sites for LFA-1 and rhinovirus. Cell 61, 243–254 (1990).
Dustin, M. L. The immunological synapse. Cancer Immunol. Res 2, 1023–1033(2014).
Acuto, O. & Cantrell, D. T cell activation and the cytoskeleton. Ann. Rev. Immunol. 18, 165–184 (2000).
Natkanski, E. et al. B cells use mechanical energy to discriminate antigen affinities. Science 340, 1587–1590 (2013).
Kaizuka, Y., Douglass, A. D., Varma, R., Dustin, M. L. & Vale, R. D. Mechanisms for segregating T cell receptor and adhesion molecules during immunological synapse formation in Jurkat T cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 20296–20301 (2007).
Murugesan, S. et al. Formin-generated actomyosin arcs propel T cell receptor microcluster movement at the immune synapse. J. Cell Biol. 215, 383–399 (2016).
Hong, J., Murugesan, S., Betzig, E. & Hammer, J. A. Contractile actomyosin arcs promote the activation of primary mouse T cells in a ligand-dependent manner. PLoS ONE 12, e0183174 (2017).
Dustin, M. L. A dynamic view of the immunological synapse. In Seminars in immunology (Elsevier) 17, 6 (2005).
Babich, A. et al. F-actin polymerization and retrograde flow drive sustained PLCγ1 signaling during T cell activation. J. Cell Biol. 197, 775–787 (2012).
Yi, J., Wu, X. S., Crites, T. & Hammer III, J. A. Actin retrograde flow and actomyosin II arc contraction drive receptor cluster dynamics at the immunological synapse in Jurkat T cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 23, 834–852 (2012).
Ritter, A. T. et al. Actin depletion initiates events leading to granule secretion at the immunological synapse. Immunity 42, 864–876 (2015).
Davis, S. J. & van der Merwe, P. A. The kinetic-segregation model: TCR triggering and beyond. Nat. Immunol. 7, 803–809(2006).
Hermiston, M. L., Xu, Z. & Weiss, A. CD45: a critical regulator of signaling thresholds in immune cells. Ann. Rev Immunol. 21, 107–137 (2003).
Call, M. E., Pyrdol, J., Wiedmann, M. & Wucherpfennig, K. W. The organizing principle in the formation of the T cell receptor–CD3 complex. Cell 111, 967–979 (2002).
Call, M. E., Pyrdol, J. & Wucherpfennig, K. W. Stoichiometry of the T-cell receptor–CD3 complex and key intermediates assembled in the endoplasmic reticulum. EMBO J. 23, 2348–2357 (2004).
Xu, C., Call, M. E. & Wucherpfennig, K. W. A membrane-proximal tetracysteine motif contributes to assembly of CD3δϵ and CD3γϵ dimers with the T cell receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 36977–36984 (2006).
Roumier, A. et al. The membrane-microfilament linker ezrin is involved in the formation of the immunological synapse and in T cell activation. Immunity 15, 715–728 (2001).
Faure, S. et al. ERM proteins regulate cytoskeleton relaxation promoting T cell–APC conjugation. Nat. Immunol. 5, 272–279 (2004).
Harwood, N. E. & Batista, F. D. Early events in B cell activation. Ann. Rev. Immunol. 28, 185–210 (2009).
Diakonova, M., Bokoch, G. & Swanson, J. A. Dynamics of cytoskeletal proteins during Fcγ receptor-mediated phagocytosis in macrophages. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 402–411 (2002).
Degn, S. E. & Tolar, P. Towards a unifying model for B-cell receptor triggering. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 25, 77–91 (2025).
Van Der Merwe, P. A. & Dushek, O. Mechanisms for T cell receptor triggering. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 11, 47–55 (2011).
Courtney, A. H., Lo, W.-L. & Weiss, A. TCR signaling: mechanisms of initiation and propagation. Trends Biochem. Sci. 43, 108–123 (2018).
Mariuzza, R. A., Agnihotri, P. & Orban, J. The structural basis of T-cell receptor (TCR) activation: An enduring enigma. J. Biol. Chem. 295, 914–925 (2020).
Kuhns, M. S. et al. Evidence for a functional sidedness to the αβTCR. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 5094–5099 (2010).
Packard, T. A. & Cambier, J. C. B lymphocyte antigen receptor signaling: initiation, amplification, and regulation. F1000prime Rep. 5, 40 (2013).
Daëron, M. F. c receptor biology. Ann. Rev. Immunol. 15, 203–234 (1997).
Bae, J. H. & Schlessinger, J. Asymmetric tyrosine kinase arrangements in activation or autophosphorylation of receptor tyrosine kinases. Mol. Cells 29, 443–448 (2010).
Kovacs, E., Zorn, J. A., Huang, Y., Barros, T. & Kuriyan, J. A structural perspective on the regulation of the epidermal growth factor receptor. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 84, 739–764 (2015).
Irvine, D. J., Purbhoo, M. A., Krogsgaard, M. & Davis, M. M. Direct observation of ligand recognition by T cells. Nature 419, 845–849 (2002).
Krogsgaard, M. et al. Agonist/endogenous peptide–MHC heterodimers drive T cell activation and sensitivity. Nature 434, 238–243 (2005).
Boniface, J. J. et al. Initiation of signal transduction through the T cell receptor requires the multivalent engagement of peptide/MHC ligands. Immunity 9, 459–466 (1998).
Trautmann, A. & Randriamampita, C. Initiation of TCR signalling revisited. Trends Immunol. 24, 425–428 (2003).
Wooldridge, L. et al. Tricks with tetramers: how to get the most from multimeric peptide–MHC. Immunology 126, 147–164 (2009).
Hamad, A. R. A. et al. Potent T cell activation with dimeric peptide–major histocompatibility complex class II ligand: the role of CD4 coreceptor. J. Exp. Med. 188, 1633–1640 (1998).
Fahmy, T. M., Bieler, J. G. & Schneck, J. P. Probing T cell membrane organization using dimeric MHC–Ig complexes. J. Immunol. Methods 268, 93–106 (2002).
Daniels, M. A. & Jameson, S. C. Critical role for CD8 in T cell receptor binding and activation by peptide/major histocompatibility complex multimers. J. Exp. Med. 191, 335 (2000).
Liu, B., Chen, W., Evavold, B. D. & Zhu, C. Accumulation of dynamic catch bonds between TCR and agonist peptide-MHC triggers T cell signaling. Cell 157, 357–368 (2014).
Krogsgaard, M., Juang, J. & Davis, M. M. A role for “self” in T-cell activation. In Seminars in Immunology (Elsevier) 19, 4 (2007).
Juang, J. et al. Peptide-MHC heterodimers show that thymic positive selection requires a more restricted set of self-peptides than negative selection. J. Exp. Med. 207, 1223–1234 (2010).
Martin-Blanco, N. et al. A window of opportunity for cooperativity in the T cell receptor. Nat. Commun. 9, 2618 (2018).
Schamel, W. W. et al. Coexistence of multivalent and monovalent TCRs explains high sensitivity and wide range of response. J. Exp. Med. 202, 493–503 (2005).
Alarcón, B., Swamy, M., van Santen, H. M. & Schamel, W. W. T-cell antigen-receptor stoichiometry: pre-clustering for sensitivity. EMBO Rep. 7, 490–495 (2006).
Kumar, R. et al. Increased sensitivity of antigen-experienced T cells through the enrichment of oligomeric T cell receptor complexes. Immunity 35, 375–387 (2011).
Huang, J. et al. A single peptide-major histocompatibility complex ligand triggers digital cytokine secretion in CD4+ T cells. Immunity 39, 846–857 (2013).
O’Donoghue, G. P., Pielak, R. M., Smoligovets, A. A., Lin, J. J. & Groves, J. T. Direct single molecule measurement of TCR triggering by agonist pMHC in living primary T cells. eLife 2, e00778 (2013).
Minguet, S., Swamy, M., Alarcón, B., Luescher, I. F. & Schamel, W. W. Full activation of the T cell receptor requires both clustering and conformational changes at CD3. Immunity 26, 43–54 (2007).
Lanz, A.-L. et al. Allosteric activation of T cell antigen receptor signaling by quaternary structure relaxation. Cell Rep. 36, 109531 (2021).
Prakaash, D., Cook, G. P., Acuto, O. & Kalli, A. C. Multi-scale simulations of the T cell receptor reveal its lipid interactions, dynamics and the arrangement of its cytoplasmic region. PLoS Comput. Biol. 17, e1009232 (2021).
van Eerden, F. J. et al. TCR-pMHC complex formation triggers CD3 dynamics. eLife 12, RP88065 (2023).
Alarcon, B. & Schamel, W. W. Allosteric changes underlie the outside-in transmission of activatory signals in the TCR. Immunol. Rev. 329, e13438 (2025).
Dong, D. et al. Structural basis of assembly of the human T cell receptor–CD3 complex. Nature 573, 546–552 (2019).
Gil, D., Schamel, W. W., Montoya, M. A., Sánchez-Madrid, F. & Alarcón, B. Recruitment of Nck by CD3ϵ reveals a ligand-induced conformational change essential for T cell receptor signaling and synapse formation. Cell 109, 901–912 (2002).
Gil, D., Schrum, A. G., Alarcón, B. & Palmer, E. T cell receptor engagement by peptide–MHC ligands induces a conformational change in the CD3 complex of thymocytes. J. Exp. Med. 201, 517–522 (2005).
Risueño, R. M., Gil, D., Fernández, E., Sánchez-Madrid, F. & Alarcón, B. Ligand-induced conformational change in the T-cell receptor associated with productive immune synapses. Blood 106, 601–608 (2005).
Risueno, R. M., Schamel, W. W. & Alarcón, B. T cell receptor engagement triggers its CD3ε and CD3ζ subunits to adopt a compact, locked conformation. PLoS ONE 3, e1747 (2008).
Aivazian, D. & Stern, L. J. Phosphorylation of T cell receptor ζ is regulated by a lipid dependent folding transition. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 7, 1023–1026 (2000).
Xu, C. et al. Regulation of T cell receptor activation by dynamic membrane binding of the CD3ɛ cytoplasmic tyrosine-based motif. Cell 135, 702–713 (2008).
Gagnon, E., Schubert, D. A., Gordo, S., Chu, H. H. & Wucherpfennig, K. W. Local changes in lipid environment of TCR microclusters regulate membrane binding by the CD3ε cytoplasmic domain. J. Exp. Med. 209, 2423 (2012).
Shi, X. et al. Ca2+ regulates T-cell receptor activation by modulating the charge property of lipids. Nature 493, 111–115 (2013).
Connolly, A. et al. TMEM16F mediates bystander TCR-CD3 membrane dissociation at the immunological synapse and potentiates T cell activation. Sci. Signal. 14, eabb5146 (2021).
Swamy, M. et al. A cholesterol-based allostery model of T cell receptor phosphorylation. Immunity 44, 1091–1101 (2016).
Minguet, S. & Schamel, W. W. A permissive geometry model for TCR–CD3 activation. Trends Biochem. Sci. 33, 51–57 (2008).
Chen, Y. et al. Cholesterol inhibits TCR signaling by directly restricting TCR–CD3 core tunnel motility. Mol. Cell 82, 1278–1287 (2022).
Martínez-Martín, N. et al. Cooperativity between T cell receptor complexes revealed by conformational mutants of CD3ɛ. Sci. Signal. 2, ra43–ra43 (2009).
Blanco, R., Borroto, A., Schamel, W., Pereira, P. & Alarcon, B. Conformational changes in the T cell receptor differentially determine T cell subset development in mice. Sci. Signal. 7, ra115–ra115 (2014).
Sušac, L. et al. Structure of a fully assembled tumor-specific T cell receptor ligated by pMHC. Cell 185, 3201–3213(2022).
Notti, R. Q. et al. The resting and ligand-bound states of the membrane-embedded human T-cell receptor–CD3 complex. Nat. Commun. 16, 10996 (2025).
Springer, T. A. Adhesion receptors of the immune system. Nature 346, 425–434 (1990).
van der Merwe, P. A., McNamee, P. N., Davies, E. A., Barclay, A. N. & Davis, S. J. Topology of the CD2-CD48 cell-adhesion molecule complex: implications for antigen recognition by T cells. Curr. Biol. 5, 74–84 (1995).
Dustin, M. L. & Springer, T. A. T-cell receptor cross-linking transiently stimulates adhesiveness through LFA-1. Nature 341, 619–624 (1989).
Grakoui, A. et al. The immunological synapse: a molecular machine controlling T cell activation. Science 285, 221–227 (1999).
Freiberg, B. A. et al. Staging and resetting T cell activation in SMACs. Nat. Immunol. 3, 911–917 (2002).
Lee, K.-H. et al. The immunological synapse balances T cell receptor signaling and degradation. Science 302, 1218–1222 (2003).
Varma, R., Campi, G., Yokosuka, T., Saito, T. & Dustin, M. L. T cell receptor-proximal signals are sustained in peripheral microclusters and terminated in the central supramolecular activation cluster. Immunity 25, 117–127 (2006).
Brameshuber, M. et al. Monomeric TCRs drive T cell antigen recognition. Nat. Immunol. 19, 487–496 (2018).
Choudhuri, K., Wiseman, D., Brown, M. H., Gould, K. & van der Merwe, P. A. T-cell receptor triggering is critically dependent on the dimensions of its peptide-MHC ligand. Nature 436, 578–582 (2005).
O’Shea, J. J., McVicar, D. W., Bailey, T. L., Burns, C. & Smyth, M. J. Activation of human peripheral blood T lymphocytes by pharmacological induction of protein-tyrosine phosphorylation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 10306–10310 (1992).
Razvag, Y., Neve-Oz, Y., Sajman, J., Reches, M. & Sherman, E. Nanoscale kinetic segregation of TCR and CD45 in engaged microvilli facilitates early T cell activation. Nat. Commun. 9, 732 (2018).
Irles, C. et al. CD45 ectodomain controls interaction with GEMs and Lck activity for optimal TCR signaling. Nat. Immunol. 4, 189–197 (2003).
Lin, J. & Weiss, A. The tyrosine phosphatase CD148 is excluded from the immunologic synapse and down-regulates prolonged T cell signaling. J. Cell Biol. 162, 673–682 (2003).
Chen, B.-M. et al. The affinity of elongated membrane-tethered ligands determines potency of T cell receptor triggering. Front. Immunol. 8, 793 (2017).
James, J. R. & Vale, R. D. Biophysical mechanism of T-cell receptor triggering in a reconstituted system. Nature 487, 64–69 (2012).
Jung, Y., Wen, L., Altman, A. & Ley, K. CD45 pre-exclusion from the tips of T cell microvilli prior to antigen recognition. Nat. Commun. 12, 3872 (2021).
Pettmann, J., Santos, A. M., Dushek, O. & Davis, S. J. Membrane ultrastructure and T cell activation. Front. Immunol. 9, 2152 (2018).
Tacke, M., Hanke, G., Hanke, T. & Hünig, T. CD28-mediated induction of proliferation in resting T cells in vitro and in vivo without engagement of the T cell receptor: evidence for functionally distinct forms of CD28. Eur. J. Immunol. 27, 239–CD247 (1997).
Lühder, F. et al. Topological requirements and signaling properties of T cell–activating, anti-CD28 antibody superagonists. J. Exp. Med. 197, 955–966 (2003).
Paluch, C., Santos, A. M., Anzilotti, C., Cornall, R. J. & Davis, S. J. Immune checkpoints as therapeutic targets in autoimmunity. Front. Immunol. 9, 2306 (2018).
Kwak, M. et al. Adherens junctions organize size-selective proteolytic hotspots critical for Notch signalling. Nat. Cell Biol. 24, 1739–1753 (2022).
Alonso, A. et al. Protein tyrosine phosphatases in the human genome. Cell 117, 699–711 (2004).
Feng, Y. et al. Mechanosensing drives acuity of αβ T-cell recognition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E8204–E8213 (2017).
Choi, H.-K. et al. Catch bond models may explain how force amplifies TCR signaling and antigen discrimination. Nat. Commun. 14, 2616 (2023).
Zhu, C., Chen, W., Lou, J., Rittase, W. & Li, K. Mechanosensing through immunoreceptors. Nat. Immunol. 20, 1269–1278 (2019).
Kim, S. T. et al. TCR mechanobiology: torques and tunable structures linked to early T cell signaling. Front. Immunol. 3, 76 (2012).
Feng, Y., Reinherz, E. L. & Lang, M. J. αβ T cell receptor mechanosensing forces out serial engagement. Trends Immunol. 39, 596–609 (2018).
Akitsu, A. et al. The αβ T cell receptor is an anisotropic mechanosenso. Sci. Adv. 10, eado4313 (2024).
Kim, S. T. et al. The αβ T cell receptor is an anisotropic mechanosensor. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 31028–31037 (2009).
Pryshchep, S., Zarnitsyna, V. I., Hong, J., Evavold, B. D. & Zhu, C. Accumulation of serial forces on TCR and CD8 frequently applied by agonist antigenic peptides embedded in MHC molecules triggers calcium in T cells. J. Immunol. 193, 68–76 (2014).
Choi, H.-K. & Zhu, C. Catch bonds in immunology. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 43, 1 (2025).
Das, D. K. et al. Force-dependent transition in the T-cell receptor β-subunit allosterically regulates peptide discrimination and pMHC bond lifetime. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 1517–1522 (2015).
Wu, P. et al. Mechano-regulation of peptide-MHC class I conformations determines TCR antigen recognition. Mol. Cell 73, 1015–1027(2019).
Hong, J. et al. A TCR mechanotransduction signaling loop induces negative selection in the thymus. Nat. Immunol. 19, 1379–1390(2018).
Sibener, L. V. et al. Isolation of a structural mechanism for uncoupling T cell receptor signaling from peptide-MHC binding. Cell 174, 672–687 (2018).
Zareie, P. et al. Canonical T cell receptor docking on peptide–MHC is essential for T cell signaling. Science 372, eabe9124 (2021).
Mallis, R. J. et al. Molecular design of the γδT cell receptor ectodomain encodes biologically fit ligand recognition in the absence of mechanosensing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2023050118 (2021).
Mallis, R. J. et al. Biophysical and structural features of αβT-cell receptor mechanosensing: a paradigmatic shift in understanding T-cell activation. Immunol. Rev. 329, e13432 (2025).
Chang-Gonzalez, A. C., Mallis, R. J., Lang, M. J., Reinherz, E. L. & Hwang, W. Asymmetric framework motion of TCRαβ controls load-dependent peptide discrimination. eLife 13, e91881 (2024).
Adams, J. J. et al. T cell receptor signaling is limited by docking geometry to peptide-major histocompatibility complex. Immunity 35, 681–693 (2011).
Yin, Y., Li, Y. & Mariuzza, R. A. Structural basis for self-recognition by autoimmune T-cell receptors. Immunol. Rev. 250, 32–48 (2012).
Qi, S., Krogsgaard, M., Davis, M. M. & Chakraborty, A. K. Molecular flexibility can influence the stimulatory ability of receptor–ligand interactions at cell–cell junctions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 4416–4421 (2006).
Armstrong, K. M., Insaidoo, F. K. & Baker, B. M. Thermodynamics of T-cell receptor–peptide/MHC interactions: progress and opportunities. J. Mol. Recognit. 21, 275–287 (2008).
Gálvez, J., Gálvez, J. J. & García-Peñarrubia, P. Is TCR/pMHC affinity a good estimate of the T-cell response? An answer based on predictions from 12 phenotypic models. Front. Immunol. 10, 349 (2019).
Tas, J. M. et al. Visualizing antibody affinity maturation in germinal centers. Science 351, 1048–1054 (2016).
Stone, J. D., Chervin, A. S. & Kranz, D. M. T-cell receptor binding affinities and kinetics: impact on T-cell activity and specificity. Immunology 126, 165–176 (2009).
Kalergis, A. M. et al. Efficient T cell activation requires an optimal dwell-time of interaction between the TCR and the pMHC complex. Nat. Immunol. 2, 229–234 (2001).
Riquelme, E., Carreño, L. J., González, P. A. & Kalergis, A. M. The duration of TCR/pMHC interactions regulates CTL effector function and tumor-killing capacity. Eur. J. of Immunol. 39, 2259–2269 (2009).
Schamel, W. W., Risueño, R. M., Minguet, S., Ortíz, A. R. & Alarcón, B. A conformation-and avidity-based proofreading mechanism for the TCR–CD3 complex. Trends Immunol. 27, 176–182 (2006).
Brockman, J. M. & Salaita, K. Mechanical proofreading: a general mechanism to enhance the fidelity of information transfer between cells. Front. Phys. 7, 14 (2019).
Moffett, A. S., Ganzinger, K. A. & Eckford, A. W. Comparing kinetic proofreading and kinetic segregation for T cell receptor activation. Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 023003 (2025).
McKeithan, T. W. Kinetic proofreading in T-cell receptor signal transduction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 5042–5046 (1995).
Stepanek, O. et al. Coreceptor scanning by the T cell receptor provides a mechanism for T cell tolerance. Cell 159, 333–345 (2014).
Voisinne, G. et al. Kinetic proofreading through the multi-step activation of the ZAP70 kinase underlies early T cell ligand discrimination. Nat. Immunol. 23, 1355–1364 (2022).
Lo, W.-L. et al. A single-amino acid substitution in the adaptor LAT accelerates TCR proofreading kinetics and alters T-cell selection, maintenance and function. Nat. Immunol. 24, 676–689 (2023).
Daniels, M. A. et al. Thymic selection threshold defined by compartmentalization of Ras/MAPK signalling. Nature 444, 724–729 (2006).
Aleksic, M. et al. Dependence of T cell antigen recognition on T cell receptor-peptide MHC confinement time. Immunity 32, 163–174 (2010).
Yousefi, O. S. et al. Optogenetic control shows that kinetic proofreading regulates the activity of the T cell receptor. eLife 8, e42475 (2019).
Valitutti, S., Müller, S., Cella, M., Padovan, E. & Lanzavecchia, A. Serial triggering of many T-cell receptors by a few peptide–MHC complexes. Nature 375, 148–151 (1995).
Valitutti, S. & Lanzavecchia, A. Serial triggering of TCRs: a basis for the sensitivity and specificity of antigen recognition. Immunol. Today 18, 299–304 (1997).
Valitutti, S. The serial engagement model 17 years after: from TCR triggering to immunotherapy. Front. Immunol. 3, 272 (2012).
Dushek, O., Das, R. & Coombs, D. A role for rebinding in rapid and reliable T cell responses to antigen. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5, e1000578 (2009).
Shi, J., Yin, W. & Chen, W. Mathematical models of TCR initial triggering. Front. Immunol. 15, 1411614 (2024).
Qin, R. et al. TCR catch bonds nonlinearly control CD8 cooperation to shape T cell specificity. Cell Res. 35, 265–83 (2025).
Dushek, O. & Van der Merwe, P. A. An induced rebinding model of antigen discrimination. Trends Immunol. 35, 153–158 (2014).
Corr, M. et al. T cell receptor-MHC class I peptide interactions: affinity, kinetics, and specificity. Science 265, 946–949 (1994).
Huang, J. et al. The kinetics of two-dimensional TCR and pMHC interactions determine T-cell responsiveness. Nature 464, 932–936 (2010).
Rushdi, M. N. et al. Cooperative binding of T cell receptor and CD4 to peptide-MHC enhances antigen sensitivity. Nat. Commun. 13, 7055 (2022).
Ben Mkaddem, S., Benhamou, M. & Monteiro, R. C. Understanding Fc receptor involvement in inflammatory diseases: from mechanisms to new therapeutic tools. Front. Immunol. 10, 811 (2019).
Schuck, P. Use of surface plasmon resonance to probe the equilibrium and dynamic aspects of interactions between biological macromolecules. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 26, 541–566 (1997).
Dustin, M. L., Ferguson, L. M., Chan, P. Y., Springer, T. A. & Golan, D. E. Visualization of CD2 interaction with LFA-3 and determination of the two-dimensional dissociation constant for adhesion receptors in a contact area. J. Cell Biol. 132, 465–474 (1996).
Chesla, S. E., Selvaraj, P. & Zhu, C. Measuring two-dimensional receptor–ligand binding kinetics by micropipette. Biophys. J. 75, 1553–1572 (1998).
Piper, J. W., Swerlick, R. A. & Zhu, C. Determining force dependence of two-dimensional receptor-ligand binding affinity by centrifugation. Biophys. J. 74, 492–513 (1998).
Bell, G. Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. Science 200, 618–627(1978).
Dustin, M. L., Bromley, S. K., Davis, M. M. & Zhu, C. Identification of self through two-dimensional chemistry and synapses. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 17, 133–157 (2001).
Zarnitsyna, V. & Zhu, C. T cell triggering: insights from 2D kinetics analysis of molecular interactions. Phys. Biol. 9, 045005 (2012).
Li, K., Cheng, X., Tilevik, A., Davis, S. J. & Zhu, C. In situ and in silico kinetic analyses of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) receptor, programmed cell death ligands, and B7-1 protein interaction network. J. Biol. Chem. 292, 6799–6809 (2017).
Chen, W., Evans, E. A., McEver, R. P. & Zhu, C. Monitoring receptor–ligand interactions between surfaces by thermal fluctuations. Biophys. J. 94, 694–701 (2008).
Huppa, J. B. et al. TCR–peptide–MHC interactions in situ show accelerated kinetics and increased affinity. Nature 463, 963–967 (2010).
Liu, B. et al. The cellular environment regulates in situ kinetics of T-cell receptor interaction with peptide major histocompatibility complex. Eur. J. Immunol. 45, 2099–2110 (2015).
Pettmann, J. et al. Mechanical forces impair antigen discrimination by reducing differences in T-cell receptor/peptide–MHC off-rates. EMBO J. 42, e111841 (2023).
Choi, H.-K. et al. Mechanotransduction governs CD40 function and underlies X-linked hyper-IgM syndrome. Sci. Adv. 10, eadl5815 (2024).
Dembo, M., Torney, D., Saxman, K. & Hammer, D. The reaction-limited kinetics of membrane-to-surface adhesion and detachment. Proc. R. Soc. B 234, 55–83 (1988).
Marshall, B. T. et al. Direct observation of catch bonds involving cell-adhesion molecules. Nature 423, 190–193(2003).
Hong, J. et al. Force-regulated in situ TCR–peptide-bound MHC class II kinetics determine functions of CD4+ T cells. J. Immunol. 195, 3557–3564 (2015).
Nishi, H. et al. Neutrophil FcγRIIA promotes IgG-mediated glomerular neutrophil capture via Abl/Src kinases. J. Clin. Invest. 127, 3810–3826 (2017).
Gonzalez, C. et al. Nanobody-CD16 catch bond reveals NK cell mechanosensitivity. Biophys. J. 116, 1516–1526(2019).
Li, K. et al. Mechanical force regulates ligand binding and function of PD-1. Nat. Commun. 15, 8339 (2024).
Zhu, C., Lou, J. & McEver, R. P. Catch bonds: physical models, structural bases, biological function and rheological relevance. Biorheology 42, 443–462 (2005).
Limozin, L. et al. TCR–pMHC kinetics under force in a cell-free system show no intrinsic catch bond, but a minimal encounter duration before binding. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 16943–16948 (2019).
Robert, P. et al. Kinetics and mechanics of two-dimensional interactions between T cell receptors and different activating ligands. Biophys. J. 102, 248–257 (2012).
Rosado, A. M. et al. Memory in repetitive protein–protein interaction series. APL Bioeng. 7, 1 (2023).
Huppa, J. B. & Schutz, G. J. T-cell antigen recognition: catch-as-catch-can or catch-22? EMBO J. https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.2023113507 (2023).
Wang, J. et al. Profiling the origin, dynamics, and function of traction force in B cell activation. Sci. Signal. 11, eaai9192 (2018).
Stanley, P. et al. Intermediate-affinity LFA-1 binds α-actinin-1 to control migration at the leading edge of the T cell. EMBO J. 27, 62–75 (2008).
Bashour, K. T. et al. CD28 and CD3 have complementary roles in T-cell traction forces. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 2241–2246 (2014).
Liu, Y. et al. DNA-based nanoparticle tension sensors reveal that T-cell receptors transmit defined pN forces to their antigens for enhanced fidelity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 113, 5610–5615(2016).
Ma, V. P. et al. The magnitude of LFA-1/ICAM-1 forces fine-tune TCR-triggered T cell activation. Sci. Adv. 8, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abg4485 (2022).
Ma, V. P.-Y. et al. Ratiometric tension probes for mapping receptor forces and clustering at intermembrane junctions. Nano Lett. 16, 4552–4559 (2016).
Nowosad, C. R., Spillane, K. M. & Tolar, P. Germinal center B cells recognize antigen through a specialized immune synapse architecture. Nat. Immunol. 17, 870–877 (2016).
Ma, R. et al. DNA probes that store mechanical information reveal transient piconewton forces applied by T cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 16949–16954 (2019).
Marshall, B. T., Sarangapani, K. K., Lou, J., McEver, R. P. & Zhu, C. Force history dependence of receptor-ligand dissociation. Biophys. J. 88, 1458–1466 (2005).
Chen, Y. et al. Fast force loading disrupts molecular bond stability in human and mouse cell adhesions. Mol. Cell. Biomech. 16, 97 (2019).
Sarangapani, K. K. et al. Regulation of catch bonds by rate of force application. J. Biol. Chem.286, 32749–32761 (2011).
Kong, F. et al. Cyclic mechanical reinforcement of integrin–ligand interactions. Mol. Cell 49, 1060–1068 (2013).
Liu, B., Chen, W. & Zhu, C. Molecular force spectroscopy on cells. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 66, 427–451 (2015).
Lee, H., Eskin, S. G., Ono, S., Zhu, C. & McIntire, L. V. Force-history dependence and cyclic mechanical reinforcement of actin filaments at the single molecular level. J. Cell Sci. 132, jcs216911 (2019).
Combs, J. D. et al. Measuring integrin force loading rates using a two-step DNA tension sensor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 23034–23043 (2024).
Hu, Y. et al. DNA-based ForceChrono probes for deciphering single-molecule force dynamics in living cells. Cell 187, 3445–3459(2024).
Jo, M. H. et al. Determination of single-molecule loading rate during mechanotransduction in cell adhesion. Science 383, 1374–1379 (2024).
Morimatsu, M., Mekhdjian, A. H., Adhikari, A. S. & Dunn, A. R. Molecular tension sensors report forces generated by single integrin molecules in living cells. Nano Lett. 13, 3985–3989 (2013).
Chang, A. C. et al. Single molecule force measurements in living cells reveal a minimally tensioned integrin state. ACS Nano 10, 10745–10752 (2016).
Göhring, J. et al. Temporal analysis of T-cell receptor-imposed forces via quantitative single molecule FRET measurements. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22775-z (2021).
Brenner, M. D. et al. Spider silk peptide is a compact, linear nanospring ideal for intracellular tension sensing. Nano Lett. 16, 2096–2102 (2016).
Woodside, M. T. et al. Nanomechanical measurements of the sequence-dependent folding landscapes of single nucleic acid hairpins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 6190–6195 (2006).
Yanagida, T. & Iwane, A. H. A large step for myosin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 9357–9359 (2000).
Takagi, Y., Homsher, E. E., Goldman, Y. E. & Shuman, H. Force generation in single conventional actomyosin complexes under high dynamic load. Biophys. J. 90, 1295–1307 (2006).
Grashoff, C. et al. Measuring mechanical tension across vinculin reveals regulation of focal adhesion dynamics. Nature 466, 263–266 (2010).
Judokusumo, E., Tabdanov, E., Kumari, S., Dustin, M. L. & Kam, L. C. Mechanosensing in T lymphocyte activation. Biophys. J. 102, L5–L7 (2012).
Ringer, P. et al. Multiplexing molecular tension sensors reveals piconewton force gradient across talin-1. Nat. Methods 14, 1090–1096 (2017).
Zarnitsyna, V. I. et al. Memory in receptor–ligand-mediated cell adhesion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 18037–18042 (2007).
Rittase, W. Combined Experimental and Modeling Studies Reveal New Mechanisms in T cell Antigen Recognition.PhD thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology (2018).
Huse, M. Mechanoregulation of lymphocyte cytotoxicity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 25, 680–695 (2025).
Göhring, J., Schrangl, L., Schütz, G. J. & Huppa, J. B. Mechanosurveillance: tiptoeing T cells. Front. Immunol. 13, 886328 (2022).
Blumenthal, D., Chandra, V., Avery, L. & Burkhardt, J. K. Mouse T cell priming is enhanced by maturation-dependent stiffening of the dendritic cell cortex. eLife 9, e55995 (2020).